Jess Davis - Profile and Journalist Details

Find journalists that align with your industry, location and vision. Unlock Jess Davis's full journalist profile, including location, coverage topics, current employer, biography and preferences. Sign up today and start building journalist relationships that fuel your startup's growth.

Get connected with journalists today
Jess Davis

Jess Davis

Verified

Climate Reporter, ABC News (Australia)

Canberra

Final Covers

daily news breaking news politics social issues

Doesn’t Cover

other, things

Journalist Type

Seniority Positions

Industries

-

Medium Formats

Content

Total articles 285

  • No Final Judgment, No Attorneys’ Fees: The Supreme Court Clarifies the Meaning of “Prevailing Party” in Lackey v. Stinnie

    By Jess Davis Verified, Steve Petkis, Sonya Winner| Lexology Verified In Lackey v. Stinnie, the Supreme Court has clarified who qualifies as a “prevailing party” eligible for attorneys’ fees under certain statutes. The decision carries significant implications for the availability of attorneys’ fees in class action cases where defendants are able to moot claims before a court enters a final judgment.

    By Jess Davis Verified, Steve Petkis, Sonya Winner · Lexology

    Mar. 05, 2025

  • What's unusual about Tropical Cyclone Alfred, and is climate change affecting how it moves towards the coast?

    By Tyne Logan Verified, Jess Davis Verified| ABC News (Australia) Verified Tropical Cyclone Alfred started off life in an unusual way, born in the South Pacific as a triplet, alongside siblings Rae and Seru. Alfred has some other quirks to its name — least of which is that it should have been called Anthony, but wasn't allowed to be named after the prime minister. So what's so unusual about TC Alfred? While it's not unheard of for three tropical cyclones to form out of the same trough, it is rare, especially in the South Pacific.

    By Tyne Logan Verified, Jess Davis Verified · ABC News (Australia)

    Mar. 04, 2025

  • No Final Judgment, No Attorneys’ Fees: The Supreme Court Clarifies the Meaning of “Prevailing Party” in Lackey v. Stinnie

    By Jess Davis Verified, Steve Petkis, Sonya Winner| Lexology Verified In Lackey v. Stinnie, the Supreme Court has clarified who qualifies as a “prevailing party” eligible for attorneys’ fees under certain statutes. The decision carries significant implications for the availability of attorneys’ fees in class action cases where defendants are able to moot claims before a court enters a final judgment.

    By Jess Davis Verified, Steve Petkis, Sonya Winner · Lexology

    Mar. 05, 2025

As seen in

Company Info

ABC News (Australia)

Kauhava, South Ostrobothnia, Finland