Michael A. Kakuk - Profile and Journalist Details

Find journalists that align with your industry, location and vision. Unlock Michael A. Kakuk's full journalist profile, including location, coverage topics, current employer, biography and preferences. Sign up today and start building journalist relationships that fuel your startup's growth.

Get connected with journalists today
Michael A. Kakuk

Michael A. Kakuk

Verified

Co-Host, CKLW-AM (Windsor, ON)

Windsor

Final Covers

Final Fantasy XIV , Video Games

Doesn’t Cover

nfl

Journalist Type

Seniority Positions

Industries

-

Medium Formats

Content

Total articles 5

  • Williams-Sonoma seeks dismissal of thread-count class action

    By Michael A. Kakuk Verified, Jessy Edwards Verified| Top Class Actions@ Update:Warby Parker beat a lawsuit alleging that it infringed on trademarks of 1-800 Contacts. A federal judge in New York cleared the eyewear provider of claims that its alleged use of targeted search engine advertising was trademark infringement. The judge ruled that a reasonable consumer would be able to tell the difference between the two companies’ marks and that Warby Parker was therefore not misleading consumers or confusing the market.

    By Michael A. Kakuk Verified, Jessy Edwards Verified · Top Class Actions

    Jun. 30, 2022

  • Old Charter Class Action Says Bourbon is Deceptively Mislabeled

    By Michael A. Kakuk Verified| Top Class Actions@ Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

    By Michael A. Kakuk Verified · Top Class Actions

    Feb. 17, 2017

  • Williams-Sonoma seeks dismissal of thread-count class action

    By Michael A. Kakuk Verified, Jessy Edwards Verified| Top Class Actions@ Update:Warby Parker beat a lawsuit alleging that it infringed on trademarks of 1-800 Contacts. A federal judge in New York cleared the eyewear provider of claims that its alleged use of targeted search engine advertising was trademark infringement. The judge ruled that a reasonable consumer would be able to tell the difference between the two companies’ marks and that Warby Parker was therefore not misleading consumers or confusing the market.

    By Michael A. Kakuk Verified, Jessy Edwards Verified · Top Class Actions

    Jun. 30, 2022

As seen in

Company Info

CKLW-AM (Windsor, ON)